HF127 - Speaking in Other Languages
To: Hebraic-Foundations@yahoogroups.com
From: "Pastor Buddy Martin" <Bro.Buddy@ChristianChallenge.org>
Date: Fri, Jul 30, 2004
Subject: Bible Study HF127 - Speaking in Other Languages
Hebraics,
I was asked to provide a study on the Biblical doctrine of
speaking in other languages and as to how this doctrine may
relate to believers today. As a prelude to the study members
may wish to review two earlier studies provided on the
subject:
HF010 - The Charismata 'glossais
lalein'
HF011 - The Corinthian Dilemma (With
Appendix)
Because the doctrine of speaking in other languages
(tongues) can take many twists and turns, let me begin by
saying that the point of the study is not to determine whether
speaking in other languages is a gifting for today. Rather we
want to consider whether some speaking in other languages
today may not actually be Biblical tongues.
This is Bible Study HF127 - Speaking in Other Languages.
The place to begin is with an Old Testament Messianic
prophecy given through the Prophet Isaiah. The prophecy says,
“Indeed, He will speak to this people through stammering
lips and a foreign tongue, He who said to them, ‘Here is
rest, give rest to the weary,’ and, ‘Here is repose,’
but they would not listen.” (Isa28:11,12)
The language of this prophecy is very important. Notice
carefully to whom the prophecy is directed, that is, to
"this" people. The prophecy is directed to the
Jewish people. This is a vital connection to the events on the
day of Pentecost, 33 a.d.
As we drop to verse
16 we find that the message being presented to
"this" people is the message of Christ Jesus. God
says, "Behold, I am laying in Zion a stone, a tested
stone, a costly cornerstone for the foundation, firmly placed.
He who believes [in it] will not be disturbed." (Jesus
Christ is the costly cornerstone.)
Now we need to return to the essence of the cornerstone
prophecy. Listen again to verse 12: "He who said to them,
'Here is rest, give rest to the weary,' and, 'Here is repose,'
but they would not listen." Someone was to speak to the
people, calling them to rest. Why does this sound familiar? It
is because we hear this very thing spoken through the Lord
Jesus.
To God's ancient people the Messiah had a number of names,
one of which was "the Rest Giver." Thus we hear
Jesus fulfill this prophecy when He says, "Come to Me,
all who are weary and heavy-laden, and I will give you rest.
Take My yoke upon you and learn from Me, for I am gentle and
humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For My
yoke is easy and My burden is light." (Matt11:28-30)
Pentecost, 33 a.d., Jews from around the world once again
gathered in Jerusalem to celebrate the pilgrim festivals. This
Pentecost would be different. On the temple mount a group of
120 men and women began suddenly to speak in the languages of
all the peoples who had gathered from the nations. A question
passed through the multitudes, “How is it that we each hear
them in our own language to which we were born?”
The speaking in other languages on the day of Pentecost was
to call attention to the Rest Giver. It was a fulfillment to
what had been written by the prophet Isaiah. The Messiah had
come, died on the cross, was buried, resurrected, and ascended
into heaven. It would be in Jesus alone that men would find
their rest.
When the multitude had gathered around the 120 disciples,
Peter then began preaching to them Jesus. Thus we see the
Isaiah 28 prophecy brought to fruition. (Speaking in other
languages in the two other places in Acts will also relate to
Pentecost 33 a.d. A study is provided for those cases.)
Let's reach forward in time. Prior to the early 1900s, the
issue of speaking in other languages was pretty much a mute
issue. The Church saw the speaking in other languages at
Pentecost 33 a.d., as a fulfillment of the Isaiah 28 prophecy.
Had Paul not told the early Christians that speaking in
tongues would cease of its own accord? And it largely did.
Occasionally over the course of time there would be
recorded instances where a Christian missionary was granted
the supernatural ability to preach the gospel to a people
group of whom the missionary did not know the language. These
cases are rare.
During the early 1900s, however, speaking in tongues once
again came to the forefront among certain groups. It became so
emphasized that speaking in tongues came to be called 'the'
evidence that a person had been 'baptized' in the Holy Spirit.
But all this happened not without concern. The Church had
never associated speaking in tongues with the Holy Spirit.
Here is where it gets sticky. Many Christians began to give
pause as to whether some of the speaking in tongues that begin
in the early 1900s was truly the Biblical gift of tongues. The
reason is because of its association with certain
non-Christian religions. Yet this was not a concern only with
Christians of our time, it was a problem that had to be dealt
with at other times. Early Church writers had to deal with the
same issue.
Now let me introduce some terms that have to do with
speaking in other languages. The word 'glossolalia' was
introduced into the English language in the 1800s. It comes
from 'glossais lelein', a term used in the New Testament,
meaning, “To speak in [with or by] tongues.” From this
comes the expression, ‘the gift of tongues.’ Actually the
phrase ‘gift of tongues’ does not occur in Scripture.
Here we need to see the concern of the early Christian
writers. Speaking in other languages was a known phenomenon in
the ancient world and especially with occultic religions.
Because of the associations, early church writers had to
explain the problem.
One early writer used the term 'glossomania' to describe
the insane speech of Greek philosophers. 'Akolalia' was
another Greek term used for the hearing of another language
even when one was not spoken. Then there was 'echolalia' which
spoke of an agitated repetition of the words of a person.
Other definitions became into being and continue to be used
today. 'Idiolect' refers to a glossolalic dialect that is
peculiar to an individual. Pentecostal and Charismatic
televangelists made this term popular by calling it a ‘prayer
language.’
Then we have the term 'exnoglossia' that was coined in the
last century to describe a spiritualist medium, which, in a
trance could write in Modern Greek, without having knowledge
of that language.
The point in all this is to understand that ‘speaking in
tongues’ is not peculiar to Pentecostals or Charismatics. It
is a known phenomenon around the world. So the question we
must keep in mind is whether all speaking in tongues today is
actually Biblical tongues. This is something people have to
decide for themselves.
Here is a quote from the Dictionary of Pentecostal and
Charismatic Movements, page 336:
“Spiritualistic glossolalia and related phenomena among
spiritual mediums were among the first studied by
psychologists near the beginning of the twentieth century. …
Pathological glossolalia is known to medicine and psychiatry,
the result of such causes as organic neurological damage,
effects of drugs, or psychotic disorders. Schizophrenic
disorders have furnished examples of glossolalia. Most
relevant to Christian glossolalia are clearly reported cases
of pagan glossolalia, both ancient and modern…. [Glossolalia]
was used sparingly among American Indians but was widespread
in African tribal religions.”
Back to the Scriptures --- Less than 50 miles from Corinth,
was the well-known Delphi worship. An inquirer would be
brought into the presence of a young woman, a priestess of
Apollo, who was said to possess a “pythonic spirit.” The
priestess would speak in tongues and a male prophet would
interpret. Paul may have referenced this in saying, “You
know that when you were pagans, you were led astray to the
mute idols, however you were led.” (1Co12:2)
It seems when Paul wrote the Corinthian Church, some of the
pagan glossolalia and prophecy was at work among the
believers.
Note: I would encourage members to do a web search on the
term "pythonic spirit." (In quotes.)
The girl that followed after Paul and Barnabas, saying,
"These men are bond-servants of the Most High God, who
are proclaiming to you the way of salvation," had a
pythonic spirit. (Check the Greek.) Notice carefully that the
spirit was not speaking anything out of the way. Yet all
attention was being drawn to the girl herself. This was
Satan's way of mimicking the things of God, yet the goal was
to interfere with the true working of the apostles.
Coming back to the Delphi priestess. A pythonic spirit
would cause the priestess to writhe on the floor. While I take
care in sharing this, I am persuaded that this same spirit
activity can be found in certain Christian circles today,
perhaps even unknowingly to the participants. All the
manifestations that are ascribed to people with a pythonic
spirit can be seen in some settings, that is, writhing on the
floor, falling out, jerking, jabbering, crying out, and
especially prophecy. A pythonic spirit loves to speak out
words of divination as though it were true prophecy. All this
is to draw attention to itself.
There is no question that speaking in tongues on the day of
Pentecost was a supernatural act of God. It is also possible
that the Lord intended to bring this gift forward at different
points in history to meet a purpose at the time. This is why I
don't want to discard all speaking in tongues today as being unbiblical.
Paul said, “Love never fails; but if there are gifts of
prophecy, they will be done away; if there are tongues, they
will cease; if there is knowledge, it will be done away.” (1Co13:8)
The Greek word for cease is 'pauo.' This is where we get
our English word pause. 'Pauo' means to make cease, or to no
longer be stirred, or to idle or unemployed. In context, Paul
is using terms that point to a maturing factor, and that
speaking in tongues would have fulfilled a purpose. Some say
Paul is speaking of heaven. But it is strange that Paul’s
entire teaching takes its center on the word ‘maturity.’
He says, “When I was a child, I use to speak as a child,
think like a child, reason like a child; when I became a man,
I did away with childish things.” (1Co13:11)
Should a child of God question issues about speaking in
tongues today? I say yes. The positive ground for any child of
God with regard to speaking in tongues is simply not to be
drawn beyond Scriptural precedents. The real key will always
be in understanding the gospel itself. The gospel bears its
own witness in the hearts of believers.
When the apostles preached the gospel, they saw no need to
put an emphasis upon speaking in tongues. The Acts of the
Apostles is conclusive evidence. The three recorded times that
people spoke in tongues were all sovereign acts of God. And to
take this a step further, Jesus actually warned the people
against seeking for signs. He said, “An evil and adulterous
generation seeks after a sign; and a sign will not be given
it, except the sign of Jonah.” (Matt16:4)
It should also be pointed out that the undue emphasis on
speaking in tongues today is only a tip of the iceberg.
Anytime something is tacked on the gospel that requires faith
other than in Jesus alone, this 'tacking on' calls for a
warning. Paul spoke of this when he said, “But I am afraid
that, as the serpent deceived Eve by is craftiness, your minds
will be led astray from the simplicity and purity of devotion
to Christ. For if one comes and preaches another Jesus whom we
have not preached, or you receive a different spirit which you
have not received, or a different gospel which you have not
accepted, you bear this beautifully.” (2Co11:3,4)
The sad side of the story is that it appears the Corinthian
Church never changed. An early writer wrote to the Church, and
said, “Your schism has subverted the faith of many, has
discouraged many, has given rise to doubt in many, and has
caused grief to us all. And still your sedition remains.”
[1st Epistle of Clement – circa 80 ad]
Certainly the doctrine of tongues is difficult to
understand. Perhaps the way to deal with it is simply not to
make it a focus. Paul said, “All do not speak in tongues, do
they?” He then went on, “But earnestly desire the greater
gifts. And I show you still a more excellent way.” (1Co12:30,31)
What did he mean by saying this is, ‘A still more
excellent way?’ Paul outlined the walk of love. When
everything else fails, love will stand the test of time. He
said, “If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but
do not have love, I have become a noisy gong or a clanging
cymbal.”
Let's complete the study for now. Feel free to offer your
thoughts.
The Lord bless you,
Buddy
Lawrence E. (Buddy) Martin, HF Host
email: Bro.Buddy@ChristianChallenge.org
Web:
http://www.christianchallenge.org/
"See to it that no one comes short of the grace
of God; that no root of bitterness springing up
causes trouble, and by it many be defiled." (Heb12:15)
Hebraic-Foundations is an online email conference which provides studies as well as offers
open discussion on the Biblical Christian. Its special emphasis is towards
the pre-325 A.D. Church.
To subscribe send an email to Hebraic-Foundations-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Once you've subscribed, messages should be sent to Hebraic-Foundations@yahoogroups.com.
Or you can subscribe by filling out the form below.
(Special note - This forum is not for Yahwists or Sabbatarians, or for
any who view the term 'Christian' in a derogatory way. Membership is
considered upon completion of a questionnaire.)
|